Issues of the object of administrative and legal regulation of mediation

Keywords: mediation, administrative and legal regulation, public relations, subject of relations, object of relations, content of legal relations, legal facts

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of one of the main elements of the content of administrative and legal regulation of mediation.
In recent decades, mediation has gained a good reputation in foreign countries as an alternative to the traditional way of resolving disputes.
Restructuring the justice system in Ukraine requires the introduction of new institutions for dispute resolution by creating a set
of internal regulations in the field of mediation. The author conducted an analysis of the scientific literature, which reflects the views
of domestic and foreign scholars on the concept and structure of the object of administrative and legal regulation. It is established that
the object of administrative and legal regulation of mediation is the relationship in the field of mediation, the elements of which are the
subjects, object, content and legal facts. It was also revealed that the subjective composition of relations in the field of mediation is
formed by the parties to the dispute, where at least one of them has power, and an independent mediator. The possibility of acting as
an independent mediator by representatives of various legal professions: lawyers, notaries, judges and court staff was clarified.
It is substantiated that the object of relations in the field of mediation as an object of administrative and legal regulation are
administrative and legal, customs, tax, election disputes, disputes concerning public service and others, i.e. disputes related to appeals
against decisions of subjects powers, regarding admission, public service, dismissal from public service, regarding legal relations related
to the election process or referendum process, etc.
The opinions of scientists on the content of relations in the field of mediation are analyzed, examples of subjective rights and
legal obligations of both the conflicting parties and the third party – the mediator. It is established that the legal facts that occur during
the study of the object of administrative and legal regulation of mediation may be the conclusion of an agreement on the provision of
mediation services (mediation agreement), termination of mediation at the request of one of the parties (application), termination mediation
procedures at the request of the mediator and concluding a mediation agreement based on the results of the procedure.

References

1. Iurkovskii, A. V. (2017). Konstitutcionno-pravovoe regulirovanie v pozitivno-pravovom smysle: poniatie i priznaki. Sibirskii iuridicheskii vestnik, 1 [in Russian].
2. Shopina, I. M. (2011). Shchodo kontseptualnykh pidkhodiv do vyznachennia poniattia pravovoho rehuliuvannia. Forum prava, 2 [in Ukrainian].
3. Nozdrachev, A. F. (2017). Sovremennoe soderzhanie poniatiia «administrativno-pravovoi rezhim». Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 2 (242) [in Russian].
4. Drobiazko, S. G. (2001). Predmet, sfera, obekt pravovogo regulirovaniia v usloviiakh formirovaniia sotcialnogo pravovogo gosudarstva i pravovogo grazhdanskogo obshchestva. Vybr. navuk. pr. Belarus. dziarzh. un-ta : u 7 t., (3) [in Russian].
5. Svinin, E. V. (2020). Obekt i predmet pravovogo regulirovaniia kak komponenty strukturnoi organizatcii pravoporiadka. Lex Russica, 1 (158) [in Russian].
6. Bondarenko, V. A. (2011). Pryznachennia ta osoblyvosti struktury administratyvno-pravovykh norm. Naukovyi visnyk, 4 [in Ukrainian].
7. Yurovska, V. V.(2016). Poniattia ta oznaky trudovykh pravovidnosyn. Pravo ta innovatsii, 1 [in Ukrainian].
8. Ivanov, E. I. (2011). Pravovoe otnoshenie kak osobyi vid obshchestvennykh otnoshenii. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatelstve. Iuridicheskii zhurnal, 2 [in Russian].
9. Rozman, Yu. V. (2013). Mediatsiia yak alternatyvnyi sposib vyrishennia pryvatno-pravovykh sporiv. Aktualni problemy polityky, 49 [in Ukrainian].
10. Yakovliev, V.V. (2017). Prysudova ta pozasudova mediatsiia: osnovni oznaky. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni H.S. Skovorody. «Pravo», (26) [in Ukrainian].
11. Vladimirova, M. O. (2012). Pravovye otnosheniia v protcedure mediatcii. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. VN Tatishcheva, 4 (77) [in Russian].
12. Kyselova, T. (2011). Pravove rehuliuvannia vidnosyn iz nadannia posluh mediatsii u zarubizhnykh krainakh. Pravo Ukrainy, 11-12 [in Ukrainian].
13. Krestovska, N.,& Romanadze, L. (2019) Mediatsiia u profesiinii diialnosti yurysta. Odesa: Ekolohiia [in Ukrainian].
14. Kholodionova, Iu. V. (2014). Mediator: professional ili net (k problemam pravovogo statusa v sviazi s priniatiem professionalnogo standarta v oblasti mediatcii). Akademicheskii vestnik, 4 [in Russian].
15. Yanovska, O., & Bitsai, A. (2014). Osoblyvosti uchasti advokata u protseduri mediatsii. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky, 1 [in Ukrainian].
16. Skopenko, O. R. (2016). Perspektivy uchastiia notariusa v protcedurakh mediatcii. Osnovnye problemy i tendentcii razvitiia v sovremennoi iurisprudentcii: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po itogam mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentcii [in Russian].
17. Zaripova, D. D. (2015). Perspektivy uchastiia notariusa v protcedurakh mediatcii. Integratciia nauki i praktiki v sovremennykh usloviiakh: Sb. materialov I Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentcii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem [in Russian].
18. Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy : Kodeks Ukrainy vid 06.07.2005 r. №2747-IV (2005). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 35 [in Ukrainian].
19. Kucheruk, N. (2019). Urehuliuvannia administratyvnoho sporu za uchastiu suddi: chomu ne diie? Hazeta Zakon i Biznes. Retrieved from: https://zib.com.ua/ua/139127-uregulyuvannya_adminsporu_za_uchastyu_suddi_chomu_ne_die.html [in Ukrainian].
20. Sitdikova, L. B.,& Shilovskaia, A. L. (2015) K voprosu ob ispolzovanii sudei v grazhdanskom protcesse elementov mediatcii. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriia: Iuridicheskie nauki, 3 [in Russian].
21. Abolonin, V. O. (2011). V poiskakh rossiiskoi modeli sudebnoi mediatcii. Rossiiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal, 5 [in Russian].
22. Kuzbagarov, A. N. (2006). Primiritelnye protcedury pri osushchestvlenii pravosudiia po grazhdanskim delam. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 1(29) [in Russian].
23. Halunko, V. (2017). Administratyvno-pravovi vidnosyny: alhorytm doslidzhennia suspilnykh vidnosyn. Naukovi zapysky Kirovohradskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Vynnychenka. Seriia: Pravo, 1 [in Ukrainian].
24. Pro mediatsiiu : Proekt Zakonu Ukrainy vid 19.05.2020 r. # 3504. (2020). Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Retrieved from: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=68877. [in Ukrainian].
25. Biluha, S. S. (2015). Dosudove vrehuliuvannia administratyvno-pravovykh sporiv : Extended abstract of PhD dissertation. Nats. un.-t «Odeska yurydychna akademiia», Odesa [in Ukrainian].
26. Filipova, I. A (2014). Pravovoi status mediatora kak rabotnika po zakonodatelstvu RF. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. NI Lobachevskogo, 3-2 [in Russian].
Published
2020-11-10
How to Cite
Tokarieva, K. (2020). Issues of the object of administrative and legal regulation of mediation. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, 1(3), 115-120. Retrieved from https://chasprava.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/483
Section
State governing and administrative law issues. Financial law. Information law