The Impact of Extra-Legal Factors on Adjudication: Theoretical and Practical Aspects

Keywords: legal realism, legal formalism, extra legal influence, bias, judicial decision, psychological impact

Abstract

Adjudication is a complex and multifaceted process that involves not only legal but also personal and psychological aspects. In a combination, they can be regarded as the extra-legal affect on specific categories of cases. The issue under studies is relatively new in present-day Ukraine. However, this field of scientific research originated in America at the end of the XIX century. Although it has lost its relevance, today, this issue is gaining popularity again, particularly in the works by both national and foreign scholars, who directly or indirectly reveal it.

The article under discussion presents the analysis of theories, developed by national and foreign authors. These works trace the tendency to identify the factors that may affect the judges’ decision-making process, both directly (legal experience; political predisposition; intellectual and temperamental traits) and indirectly (overall erudition; family and personal associations, social status).What is more, the author of the article has identified two possible options for a judge to make a decision - by justice and by law. They are by no means related to each other, since not all the decisions, made in compliance with the law, are fair, whereas it is much easier to make fair decisions conform to the letter of the law.

This research is based on the materials of study carried out in 1914-1916 regarding some New York City magistrate judges, who made different decisions on similar categories of cases. Such a discrepancy again outlines the boundaries of individual relationships that affect the administration of justice.

In addition to the above, the theoretical material, outlined in the article, is rests on the examples from the court records of Canada and Ukraine. This made it possible to prove and realize that such extra-legal impact does exist today and is ruining the judicial system from inside.Besides, the investigation reveals the ECHR’s position on the issue under study. Relying on specific examples, we have pointed out various manifestations of judges’ bias. In those cases, they were driven by personal views and motives, which, in turn, influenced their final decisions, the latter being subsequently challenged.

References

Timothy J. Capurso. (1998). How judges judge: theories on judicial decision making. URL: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1909&context=lf [in English].
Sokil U. V. (2015). Vplyv indyvidualʹnosti suddi na pryynyattya sudovoho rishennya u filosofiyi amerykansʹkoho pravovoho realizmu. URL: http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/evpe_2015_7_6.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Frank J. (1930). Law and the modern mind New Brunswick: Copyright by Transaction Publishers 2009 year [in English].
Adyhezalova H. É. & Karl Nykerson Llevellyn. (2009). Amerikanskiy pravovoy realism. Pravovedenye. 2. 182-207 [in Russian].
J.C. Hutcheson, (1929). The Judgment Intuitive: The Function of the "Hunch" in Judicial Decision [in English].
Alex Kozinski. (1993). What I Ate for Breakfast and Other Mysteries of Judicial Decision Making. Loyola of angeles Law review. 993-1000. URL: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1799&context=llr [in English].
Hannes Graah. (2015). Judicial decision-making and extra-legal influences. URL: http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=7363507&fileOId=7363527 [in English].
Ayvy A.V. & Saymek-Daunynh. L. (2000). Psykholohycheskoe konsulʹtyrovanye y psykhoterapyya. metody, teoryy y tekhnyky: praktycheskoe rukovodstvo, Moskva [in Russian].
Orban Lembryk L.E & Koshchynetsʹ V.V. (2007). Yurydychna psykholohiya: navch. Posibnyk Chernivtsi [in Ukrainian].
Fursa S.Y. & Fursa Y.I. & Shcherbak S.V. (2006). Tsyvilʹnyy protsesualʹnyy kodeks Ukrayiny: Naukovo-praktychnyy komentar: u 2 t. Kiev [in Ukrainian].
Chernovsʹkyy O.K. (2013) Vplyv vnutrishnʹo-psykholohichnykh chynnykiv na pryynyattya suddeyu rishenʹ po kryminalʹniy spravi. Yevropeysʹki perspektyvy. 11. 150-153. URL: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/evpe_2013_11_25.pdf
Hroshevoy Y.M. (1975). Problemy formyrovanyya sudeyskoho ubezhdenyya v uholovnom sudoproyzvodstve [in Russian].
Hranat N.L. & Pohybko Y.N. (1972). Vnutrenee ubezhdenye v strukture krymynalystycheskoho mʹshshenyya. Moskva. [in Russian].
Published
2020-04-15
How to Cite
Shevchuk, V. (2020). The Impact of Extra-Legal Factors on Adjudication: Theoretical and Practical Aspects. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, (1), 434-438. https://doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.1.2020.87