Amnesty for combatants involved in armed condlicts: between peace and justice

Keywords: armed conflict, amnesty, international law, temporary occupied territories, international organisation

Abstract

The article deals with amnesty for combatants, who committed crimes in international armed conflicts or armed conflicts of non-international character in foreign countries, there are also explored conclusions and recommendations of international government and non-government organisations on exemption combatants from criminal liability.

It’s obviously, that amnesty does not apply to the perpetrators of such crimes as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, torture, enforced disappearances, and some others.

Considering the extended armed conflict in the east of Ukraine, it’s extremely necessary to examine the institution of amnesty within the context of diplomatic and peaceful measures of ending the conflict. As far as Ukraine is concerned, amnesty in Ukraine is a step towards general reconciliation of the society given serious work and understanding within the society is completed.

Moreover, in article discussed the question on specificities of amnesty's implementation in context of armed conflict on temporary occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Special attention is focused on binding terms of amnesty for combatants.

As a conclusion, author of this article states on some necessary conditions for implementing the amnesty for combatants in post-conflict society. These conditions are:

  • Disarmament, demobilisation, reintegration. This is one of the most controversy and difficult steps. Combatants only then are going to be disarmed when they feel their safety under international and national law.
  • There is a list of human rights violations that may not be pardoned by the amnesty: genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
  • The nation and victims of the armed conflict have to know the truth about all violations of human rights according to international humanitarian law and international human rights law.

It’s important to understand, that amnesty is one of the institutions in oust-conflict society, that aimed for the end of the conflict, stabilisation of the politica; situation in the country, disarming and reintegration.

References

Freeman, Mark. 2009. Necessary Evils: Amnesties and the Search for Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. L: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/necessary-evils/8C570946A082DA530571C4883E6402B4 [in English].
Carolyn Bull, Amnesty (2001) (Prepared by Carolyn Bull for Interim Office, Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor [in English].
Vivanco, José Miguel. (2016). Colombia Peace Deal’s Promise, and Flaws. Human Rights Watch (October 30, 2016. URL: https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/09/27/colombia-peace-deals-promise-and-flaws [in English].
Orentlicher, Diane F. (1995). Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime. In Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Vol 1, edited by Neil J. Kritz. Washington, DC: USIP [in English].
Bass, Gary J. (2016). Bargaining Away Justice: India, Pakistan, and the International Politics of Impunity for the Bangladesh Genocide. International Security 41 (2): 140–187 URL: https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/10.1162/ISEC_a_00258?mobileUi=0& [ in English].
McEvoy, Kieran, and Louise Mallinder. (2012). Amnesties in Transition: Punishment, Restoration, and the Governance of Mercy. Journal of Law and Society 39 (3): 410–440. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00591.x [in English].
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), 8 June 1977. URL: https://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/INTRO/475 [in English].
Rezoliutsyia 56 Heneralnoi Assambley OON A/56/677b ot 4 dekabria 2001 h. o Prynstonskykh pryntsypakh unyversalnoi yurysdyktsyy A/56/677b. URL: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/docs/56/677b.htm) [in Russian].
Verkhovenstvo prava: doklad Evropeiskoi Komyssyy za demokratyiu cherez pravo (Venetsyia, 25–25 marta, 2011 h.). URL: http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDLAD%282011%29003rev-rus [in Russian].
Kompleks mer po vypolnenyiu Mynskykh sohlashenyi, sohlasovannyh Trёkhstoronnei kontaktnoi hruppoi na sammyte v Mynske 12 fevralia 2015 [in Russian].
Sovet Bezopasnosty OON. Zaiavlenyia o sytuatsyy v Khorvatyy Predsedatelia 4 ot 6 marta 1997 h. (S/PRST/1997). URL: https://documents-ddsny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N97/030/04/PDF/N9703004.pdf?OpenElement [in Russian].
Kobina Egyir Daniel. Amnesty as a tool of transitional justice: the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission in profile. Pretoria, South Africa, 2001. 58 р. [in English].
Mykola Hnatovskyi: Ukraini dovedetsia shukaty svoiu vlasnu model amnistii. URL: http://ecpl.com.ua/news/mykola-hnatovs-kyy-ukraini-dovedet-sia-shukaty-svoiu-vlasnu-model-amnistii/ [in Ukrainian].
Second Generation Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (DDR) Practices in Peace Operations. URL: https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/second-generation-disarmament-demobilization-and-reintegration-ddr-practices-peace-operations [in English].
Published
2020-04-15
How to Cite
Ivzhenko, D. (2020). Amnesty for combatants involved in armed condlicts: between peace and justice. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, (1), 418-421. https://doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.1.2020.83