Role of e-states in providing of informational security

Keywords: state models, e-state, informational security, development models of e-state

Abstract

Changes and innovations began in information society have affected to economic, social, political and cultural life. Notion of new state; model of e-state begins to gain importance as a result of formed changed in area of managment. Notion of traditional state managment has been replaced with the notion of state managment holding features of clearness, transperancy, convenient, rapidity and effectivness as a result of establishment of e-state. The relocation of information technology in public services to the electronic environment has led to changes in e-government management. That’s why, in the recent time, application of e-state has been widely widespreaded in area of state regarding the international and national level. Governments around the world, taking advantage of growing information and communication technologies, initiate projects to develop political norms aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of public administration. During this time, the efforts of governments are also supported by international organizations. The emphasis of this problem on the part of both international and national structures has led to the fact that, along with the services of the electronic state, various methods of their technological and political characteristics are being formed. In this context, the problem of the electronic state in both the conceptual and applied aspects has been widely discussed and used in many scientific studies and literature for a short period of time. Thanks to the electronic state, which means the provision of public services in the electronic environment, public access to services is becoming faster and cheaper. E-government is also explained as the provision of public services to citizens through information and communication technologies.

Although the electronic state is considered as a new concept, the means that determine the novelty of the electronic state are associated with the methods and characteristics used that underline this concept. The concept of the state still retains its original purpose. The only new thing here is how and in what ways the electronic state fulfills its function, in contrast to the traditional one. Consequently, the electronic state is actually considered as a model that emphasizes the structural state of the state, and not as an approach based on the continuation of the traditional state. We can say that the electronic state is not just a government website, but all that exists within the framework of political, social, economic and technological means.

References

Acar M. ve Kumaş E. (2008). Kamu Hizmetlerinin Sunumunda Dönüm Noktası: Edevlet, Ankara: Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Matbaası. S. 1.
Altınok, A.R. (2005). E-dönüşüm Yolunda Türkiye: E-devlet Startejisi Hazırlama Süreci ve Yaşanan Sorunlar” İstanbul: Beta Basım. 133.
Ali Arifoğlu, Abdullah Körnes, Ali Yazıcı, Kemal Akgül, Ahmet Ayvalı (Der.) (2002). Е-Devlet Yolunda Türkiye,Türkiye Bilişim Derneği (TBD) / Kamu–İB, 11; 13.
C. Can Aktan, “Neden E-Devlet”. URL: http://www.canaktan.org/politika/e-devlet
Ceylin Beyli. (2004). Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Hakkında Kanun Tasarısı Üzerine Eleştiriler, Türkiye Bilişim Şurası Hukuk Çalışma Grubu Kişisel Veriler Raporu, 3.
Derecioğlu, Korcan. (2006). Siber Terörizm… Tehlikenin Ne Kadar Farkındayız?”, Bilişim ve Hukuk Dergisi, Ankara. 1. 39.
Dijital Devlet, Dijital Devlet uygulamasında teknolojinin katkılarıneler olacaktır? URL: http://www.digitaldevlet.com/sss.php
Emin Sadık Aydın. Bilişim Teknolojilerindeki Gelişmelerin e-Devlete Yansımaları”, 4-5 Kasım, Ulusal E-Devlet Konferansı Sunum Notları. URL: www.edevletkonferansi.org
İnce M. (2001). Elektronik Devlet: Kamu Hizmetlerinin Sunulmasında Yeni İmkanlar.Ankara: DPT Yayınları. 133.
Kuran N.H. (2005). Türkiye İçin E-devlet Modeli. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları
Levent Yanık, Değişimin Rotası e-Türkiye. URL: http://www.teknoturk.org/docking/yazilar/t
Marquardt, K. ve Gökçe, O., (2008). E-devlet: Kavramın Anlamı ve Kapsamı”.Çizgi Kitabevi, Yayınları.Konya. 27.
Mustafa K. Öktem, Uğur Ömürgönlüşen. (2004). Kamu Yönetimi, Gelişimi ve Güncel Sorunları, İmajYayınevi, Ankara. 143.
N.Murat İnce. Elektronik Devlet: Kamu Hizmetlerinin Sunulmasında Yeni İmkânlar DPT Yay. http://www.dpt.gov.tr, 2001. 13.
Odabaş, H. (2009). E-devlet Sürecinde Elektronik Belge Yönetimi. İstanbul: Türk Kütüphaneciler Derneği. 8–9.
Parlak Bekir and Zahid Sobacı. (2012). UlusalVeKüresel Pespektifte KamuYönetimi: Teori Ve Pratik. Gözden geçirilmiş ve geliştirilmiş 4.baskı.Bursa: MKMYayınları, 227–228.
Şeref Sağıroğlu. E-Devlette Bilgi Güvenliği”, 4-5 Kasım 2008 Ulusal E-Devlet Konferansı Sunum Notları. URL: www.edevletkonferansi.org
T .C Sayıştay Başkanlığı, E-Dönüşüm Türkiye Projesi Çerçevesinde Yürütülen Faaliyetler, Performans Denetimi Raporu, Ankara, 2006. S. 106.
Yıldız, M. (2007). Uluslararası Kuruluşların Türkiyenin E-devlet Siyasalarına Etkisi. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 40(2). 39.
Al-Hashmi, A. ve Darem, A. B. (t.y.) Understanding Phases of E-government Project. URL: http: //csi-sigegov.orgwww.csi-sigegov.org/emerging-pdf/.18.05.2019. S. 152.
Coursey, D. ve Norris, D. (2008). Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment. Public Administration Review, 68(3): 523–536. URL: http://www.wiki.dbast.com/images/temp/2/2f/20090314050850!Model-of-E-Government--Are-They-Correct--An-Empirical Assessment. pdf.
Commission of the European Communities (2003). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The Role of E-government for Europe's Future. URL: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM: 0567: FIN: EN: PDF.
Evans, Donna, Yen, David C. (2006). E-Government: Evolving Relationship of Citizens and Government, Domestic, and International Development, Government InformationQuarterly 23, 211.
Editorial. The E-Government Paradox: Better Customer Service Doesn't Necessarily Cost Less”, Government Information Quarterly 25, 2008. S. 152.
Heeks R. What is eGovernment? URL: http://www.egov4dev.org/success/definitions.html
Jayashree, S. ve Marthandan G. Government to E-government to Esociety. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10: 2205–2210. URL: http://scialert.net/fulltext/?doi=jas.2010.2205.2210&org=11#558080-ja
McClure, D. L. (2000). Electronic Government: Federal Initiatives Are Evolving Rapidly But They Face Significant Challenges. URL: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/a200179t.pdf
Mohamed A. Nour Et Al. (2008). A Context-Based Integrative Framework for E-Government Initiatives, Government Information Quarterly 25. 455.
Subhash Bhatnagar. E-Governance: e-Government for Empowering Rural Communities. URL: http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/infrastructure/forum, 12.05.2019.
UN (2004) Global E-government Readiness Report 2004. Towards Access for Opportunity: Towards Access for Opportunity. United Nations. URL: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN019207.pdf
United Nations. Global E-Government Survey 2003. 112 p.
Bachylo Y.L. (2013). Ynformatsyonnoe pravo: uchebnyk dlia mahystrov. 2-e yzd., pererab. y dop. Moskva [in Russian]
Halatenko V.A. (2006). Osnovy ynformatsyonnoj bezopasnosty: Kurs lektsyj: ucheb. posob. 3-e yzd. / pod red. V.B. Betelyna. Moskva [in Russian]
Kabanov Yu.A. (2014). Ynformatsyonnoe prostranstvo kak novoe (heo)polytycheskoe prostranstvo: rol' y mesto hosudarstv. Sravnytel'naia polytyka. 4 (17). 57.
Published
2020-04-15
How to Cite
Ibrahimova, A. (2020). Role of e-states in providing of informational security. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, (1), 401-406. https://doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.1.2020.79