Unchained freedom in cyberspace: a new danger for children’s rights
The article is dedicated to the harm of cyberspace over children's digital rights in the Internet and introduces conclusions for better defeating digital violations. Digital violations against child rights exist in various forms. Although violation of children's digital rights is the reality of current life, still there is no unified and well-developed system of solutions to restrict freedom in cyberpace. Cyberspace opens new borders for entertainment, education, cultural and moral development of children. Yet, possible difficulties arise when it comes to suitable child rights. Children's digital rights is significantly more complex and multifaceted. Few norms in international law can be found for the regulation of cyberspace and the digital rights of children in this new medium. The content and scope of digital rights of children have not been defined yet. Thus, systemic international and national cyberspace mechanisms relating to the rights of the child should be created on the basis of state control.
Maras M.H. (2015). Internet of Things: security and privacy implications. International Data Privacy Law. Vol. 5. 2. 99-104.
David S. (2014). Building inclusive knowledge societies: a review of UNESCO's action in implementing the WSIS outcomes. UNESCO, Paris.
Gomes de Andrade N.N. and Lúcio T.F. (2016). New technologies and human Rights: challenges to regulation. 1st ed. USA, New York: Routledge, Taylor&Francis Group.
Pramod K.N. (2010). An introduction to new media and cybercultures. UK, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Martin D.R., Michele P.B. and Michael F. (2017). Handbook of children's rights: global and multidisciplinary perspectives. 1st ed. USA, New York: Routledge.
Eva L. (2010). Protecting children in the digital era: the use of alternative regulatory instruments. USA, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Council of Europe. (2014). Recommendation CM/Rec (2014)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on a Guide to Human Rights For Internet Users. (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 16 April 2014 at the 1197th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies).
European Court of Human Rights. Case of K.U. v. Finland. Application no. 2872/02. Judgment of 2 December 2008 http://www.adae.gr/fileadmin/docs/nomoi/Eyropaiki_Enosi/KU_v._Finland.pdf
Joanne W. (2019). Social media in social work practice. UK, London: SAGE Publications.
Mahmoudi S., Leviner P., Kaldal A. and Katrin L. (2015). Child-friendly justice: a quarter of a century of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Netherlands, Leiden: Brill Nijhoff Publishing.
Taddeo M. and Floridi L. (2017). The responsibilities of online service providers. Switzerland, Cham: Springer International Publishing.