Conceptual Problems of Modern Unitarianism

Keywords: unitarianism, unitarity, territory, state, state system, unitary system, administrative-territorial system

Abstract

The aim of the article is to study the essential and substantial characteristics of unitarism as a phenomenon of modern constitutional law. The synergistic connection between the doctrine of modern unitarism, the principles of unitarity of the state territory and the fundamental institutions of political-legal and state-administrative life of modern unitary states is shown. It proves that the unitary system is not only one of the important components of the process of achieving the tasks, goals and functions of most modern states, but also an immanent feature and strategic element of the mechanism of exercising their sovereign rights.

The complexity, importance and relatively widespread use of unitarity as a form of government is causing a lively and ever-growing scientific interest in it throughout the world. The unique ability of Unitarianism to take into account the specific features of a particular condition allows it to manifest itself in each case in a new way. That is why it is important to analyze the mutual influence of unitary theory and practice, to explore and take into account the peculiarities of national unitarism.

The problem of unitarism and the unitary form of the territorial structure of the state and the status of its constituents is one of the least studied in domestic constitutional law. Modern representatives of the science of constitutional law, as a rule, are limited to consideration of individual issues of the territory, in particular, the features of the territorial organization of state power and local self-government, problems of state sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability, etc. To a large extent, a lack of study of the problem in contemporary Ukraine causes difficulties in understanding such interrelated but not identical phenomena as unitarism and unitarity, regionalism and regionalization, municipalism and municipalization, decentralization and deconcentration, etc. It should be noted that in modern literature on issues of state territory, territorial organization of state power, and other issues of the status of territory, the complex, multidimensional nature of unitarianism as a constitutional category is not always taken into account.

Unitarianism is proved to be a multidimensional socio-political and constitutional phenomenon: it is an idea, a theory, a scientific direction, and a global social and constitutional practice, and a constitutional form of the existence and functioning of territorial communities, and the historical state of national statehood and Ukrainian regional civilization. and the form of realization of national identity and citizenship, etc.

References

Mishchuk, V. V. (2010). Unitaryzm yak pryntsyp derzhavnoho ustroiu [Unitarianism as a Principle of Government]. Universytetski naukovi zapysky. № 4. S. 14 [in Ukrainian].
Savchyn, M. V. (2009). Konstytutsiine pravo Ukrainy [Constitutional Law of Ukraine]: pidruchnyk. Kyiv: Pravova yednist [in Ukrainian].
Kushnirenko, A. (2014). Princip unitarizma kak forma gosudarstvennogo edinstva i bazovaja cennost’ konstitucionnogo stroja Ukrainy [The principle of unitarism as a form of state unity and the basic value of the constitutional system of Ukraine]. Jurnalul juridic national: teorie şi practică. Nr. 6(10). 56–60 [in Russian].
Hetman, A. B. (2013). Konstytutsiino-pravovi zasady administratyvno-terytorialnoho ustroiu Ukrainy [Constitutional and legal principles of the administrative and territorial structure of Ukraine]: dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. yuryd. nauk: spets. 12.00.02 «Konstytutsiine pravo; munitsypalne pravo». Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Hrechko, O. O. (2018). Pryntsypy terytorialnoho ustroiu Ukrainy: konstytutsiino-pravovyi aspekt [Principles of territorial structure of Ukraine: constitutional and legal aspect]: dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. yuryd. nauk: spets. 12.00.02 «Konstytutsiine pravo; munitsypalne pravo». Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Bondar, M. (2014). Terytoriia yak konstytutsiina tsinnist: poiednannia publichno-vladnykh ta pryvatno-osobystisnykh zasad [Territory as Constitutional Value: Combining Public-Power and Private-Personal Foundations]. Pravo Ukrainy. 9. 22–31 [in Russian].
Sysoeva, E. A. (2006). Kategorija «territorija» v pravovoj teorii i praktike zakonodatel’nogo regulirovanija federativnogo ustrojstva sovremennoj Rossii [The category «territory» in the legal theory and practice of legislative regulation of the federal structure of modern Russia]: avtoref. diss. na soiskanie uchen. stepeni kand. jurid. nauk: spec. 12.00.01 «Teorija i istorija gosudarstva i prava; Istorija uchenij o prave i gosudarstve». Rostov-na-Donu [in Russian].
Baburin, S. N. (1998). Territorija gosudarstva: Teoretiko-pravovye problemy [Territory of the State: Theoretical and Legal Problems]: avtoref. diss. na soiskanie uchen. stepeni d-ra jurid. nauk: spec. 12.00.01 «Teorija prava i gosudarstva; Istorija prava i gosudarstva; Istorija pravovyh i politicheskih uchenij». Moskva [in Russian].
Volynets, V. V. (2012). Funktsii suchasnoi derzhavy: teoretyko-pravovi problemy [Functions of the modern state: theoretical and legal problems]: monohrafiia. Kyiv: Lohos [in Ukrainian].
Loshchykhin, O. M. (2013). Funktsii suchasnoi derzhavy: narys yurydychnoi teorii [Functions of the modern state: an outline of legal theory]: monohrafiia. Kyiv: Lohos [in Ukrainian].
Shatilo, V. A. (2018). Konstytutsiinyi mekhanizm derzhavnoi vlady v Ukraini: problemy spivvidnoshennia orhanizatsiinykh struktur i funktsii [The constitutional mechanism of state power in Ukraine: problems of correlation of organizational structures and functions]: dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia d-ra yuryd. nauk: spets. 12.00.02 «Konstytutsiine pravo; munitsypalne pravo». Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Sarnovska, S. O. (2000). Suchasna sotsialna komunikatyvna kultura (filosofsko-metodolohichnyi analiz) [Modern social communication culture (philosophical and methodological analysis)]: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. filos. nauk: spets. 09.00.03 «Sotsialna filosofiia ta filosofiia istorii». Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Published
2020-04-15
How to Cite
Batanov, O. (2020). Conceptual Problems of Modern Unitarianism. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, (1), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.1.2020.16
Section
Constitutional law. Municipal law